On 30/07/07, GerardM gerard.meijssen@gmail.com wrote:
Hoi, The discussion states that it is a policy statement and not a technical discussion.
There are technical reasons why it is not feasible to have a consistent implementation of a different methodology. It is imho a waste of time to discuss what you want to change if it is technically not possible and certainly when this is clear from the start. Thanks, GerardM
So please discuss those technical reasons. To not do so would be to waste the discussion and everybody's time. Maybe it's impossibility is also just your opinion. Or if this impossibility has been clear from the start please point us to a clear description of the insurmountable problems.
Thanks.
Andrew Dunbar (hippietrail)
On 7/30/07, Ariel T. Glenn ariel@columbia.edu wrote:
Please see
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Interwiki.py/Wiktionary_functionality_discuss... complete information. The dicussion page on Meta is intended to provide a space for folks from every wiktionary project to discuss and decide upon the behavior and features of the interwiki links bot (RobotGMwikt); until now, there has been no such mechanism. Besides your participation, we also need folks who are able to help translate the dicussion on an ongoing basis as appropriate.
Thanks.
Ariel Glenn
Wiktionary-l mailing list Wiktionary-l@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiktionary-l
Wiktionary-l mailing list Wiktionary-l@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiktionary-l