Since the languages are virtually the same it's probably better for the mopedia to redir to the ropedia, so that Moldovan users can reach info in a language understood by them, instead of being restricted to the crappy Moldovan wp, perhaps without knowledge of the Romanian one.
From the summary above I see no reason to keep the mowiki in a locked
state.
/Andreas
On 3/6/06, Bogdan Giusca liste@dapyx.com wrote:
Since most content is (rather badly) transliterated from Romanian Wikipedia and the few original articles are short and badly written, I wouldn't say that the current content on mo.wiki has any value.
The transliteration between "Romanian" Latin alphabet and "Moldovan" Cyrillic alphabet can be done pretty accurate by a script. I have made a php script for testing and I think it could be improved to near 100% accuracy, but I doubt it would be necessary.
Latin alphabet has been official in the Republic of Moldova for the last 17 years and virtually all Moldovans can use it. Then, there's the unrecognized territory of Transnistria where Moldovan children are still taught in that alphabet, (although it's not what they really want, see the 2004 crisis)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/3631436.stm
There has been some discussion on whether Romanian Wikipedia should have a Cyrillic alphabet section or that we should have a transliteration script integrated, but the truth is that we have yet to find a Moldovan willing to contribute using the Cyrillic alphabet.
As such, I think that it would be better to be a redirect.
Sunday, March 5, 2006, 11:38:13 PM, you wrote:
A> Well...
A> This is a summary such as we would be happy to see more often ! Thanks A> for it Bogdan !
A> A question : do you think it should just be "frozen" as is ? (no more A> editable). A> Or do you think mo.wikipedia should redirect to ro.wikipedia ?
A> ant
Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@Wikimedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l