Thanks for the praise - I guess... :)
To answer the question (the subject line), we'll switch to new hardware and software soon, and I am pretty sure the performance problems will decrease or go away completely.
Try it out at http://beta.wikipedia.com (both new hard- and software).
Magnus
-----Original Message----- From: wikipedia-l-admin@nupedia.com [mailto:wikipedia-l-admin@nupedia.com]On Behalf Of Tim Chambers Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 10:28 PM To: wikipedia-l@nupedia.com Subject: [Wikipedia-l] what's being done about performance?
Maybe I just haven't noticed the appropriate messages sent to this list, but it seems to me that progress reports have been spotty. Is there discussion going on somewhere else?
I'm very bummed. I try to pepper my postings at K5 with links to the 'pedia, but today I couldn't even get to the main page. I had to link to archives.org instead [1]. I would have preferred to put that high-quality off-site link [2] in the 'pedia Titanic article and linked to it instead of [2]. :-( (Breaking News: While composing this, I was finally able to get to wikipedia.com and make the edit.)
I'm deeply saddened that Wikipedia is a victim of its own success, but I also want to praise Jimbo, Magnus, Lee, and all the others who've supported the project technically. I'd offer to help right now, but I have other commitments for the next couple of weeks... I'd just like a way to stay abreast of developments.
<>< Tim
[1] see the Titanic link at http://www.kuro5hin.org/comments/2002/7/9/04416/40645/222#222 [2] http://www.archives.gov/exhibit_hall/american_originals/titanic.html
Do You Yahoo!? Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free http://sbc.yahoo.com [Wikipedia-l] To manage your subscription to this list, please go here: http://www.nupedia.com/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l