Jake Nelson wrote:
Reminds me. There really should be a Wikimedia-l, imho. Wikimedia is more than just the 'pedia, after all! (Wiktionary, Wikibooks, Wikiquote...) I'd kind of like to get in on WM planning discussions- I worked for a nonprofit (in education, at that) for 5 years, was at one point in charge of reorganizing all the documentation and policy for it, have dealt with a lot of this stuff before.
I agree. I too have had my share of experience with nonprofits. Unfortunately a vast majority of members (however you may define that) of such organizations are blissfully ignorant when it comes to corporate documentation. They usually avoid meetings that discuss by-laws or the election of officers, and when things go wrong use that as an excuse to absolve themselves of all responsibility. Judging by the lack of response when these matters are raised, Wikimedia is no different.
Eclecticology