lcrocker@nupedia.com wrote:
[Re: having experts write reviews of Wiki articles]
Such reviews would be themselves fully credited and not editable, and attached to the article they describe, but the subject article itself would remain fully editable.
Two good points about this idea strike me immediately:
* there's no forking of articles -- no concurrent versions * there's a good chance that experts will dive in and make improvements to the Wikipedia articles they have reviews :-)