Magnus Manske wrote:
No I didn't, I wasn't aware to that. (Which probably means I heared about it but promptly forgot;-)
Anyway, mine is very simple: a new field in the page table, indication the current "stable" version, or "0" if there is none. And a small notice in the sub-header, with links.
Tim, if yours is more advances/better integrated/favorable in some other way, please tell me so I won't waste any more time on my implementation here.
That's the same as Salvatore's feature. Whether it'll be good enough or not depends on whether we need a tag table indexed by revision for our caching system. See my discussion of this on wikitech-l.
-- Tim Starling