Gerrit Holl wrote:
Elisabeth Bauer wrote:
There's rubbish on wikibooks like the "How to get a girl manual"?
What's wrong with it? Do you mean that the book is not mature yet or is there something (?) inheritently wrong with having a book on the subject? The only thing I can see is 'no original research', but then I wonder if this would be called research at all. It survived a deletion vote.
It did? Good grief. I'm going to delete it myself, then.
It is a blatant violation of the charter of Wikibooks and takes the project in a completely wrong direction. Wikibooks is not the place for any random concept of a book that people may have. It is a place for _textbooks_, and the defining rule needs to be the ability to point to a specific course at the early childhood, kindergarten, elementary, junior high, high school, or university level in which such a _textbook_ is _currently_ used.
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/A_survival_guide_for_people_on_the_autistic_spe... is similar but just not yet started. What's the problem?
It is not a textbook.
--Jimbo