Manning Bartlett wrote:
The solution to 24 is probably the same as with Cunctator - the silent ignore and passive editing approach. Maveric has tried to reason with 24 repeatedly, but when reason is clearly failing there is nothing else to do but protect the project.
I think that what "worked" with Cunc was (a) responding to his legitimate concerns and (b) reasoning with him to be nicer with his complaints.
But, yeah, trying to focus multiple people's attention on making sure he doesn't screw anything up in the meantime is probably a good idea.
However, entire articles which usurp recognised terms for personal dogma are not controversial at all - they have to go, and that's that. Collectively it is our responsibility to get rid of them.
Yes. Or better, to fix them.
--Jimbo