Yes, that's what I was saying. "that would exclude".
--node
On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 14:11:19 +0200, Yann Forget yann@forget-me.net wrote:
Hi,
Le Sunday 19 September 2004 07:19, Mark Williamson a écrit :
If you were looking for "dead languages" and conlangs, that would exclude Breton, Faroese, Latvian, Kashubian, and Nynorsk (Nynorsk is basically an official codification of rural SW Norwegian speech forms, it can hardly be considered a conlang).
Breton is not a dead language. There are schools where children are teached mathematics and history in Breton. cf. look Diwan at Google i.e. http://perso.wanadoo.fr/diwan.bro.roazhon/
best, node
Regards, Yann -- http://www.non-violence.org/ | Site collaboratif sur la non-violence http://www.forget-me.net/ | Alternatives sur le Net http://fr.wikipedia.org/ | Encyclopédie libre http://www.forget-me.net/pro/ | Formations et services Linux
Pawel wrote:
MW> If you were looking for "dead languages" and conlangs, that would MW> exclude Breton, Faroese, Latvian, Kashubian, and Nynorsk (Nynorsk is MW> basically an official codification of rural SW Norwegian speech forms, MW> it can hardly be considered a conlang).
Kashubian is not a dead language. There are still many native speakers in Kashubia.