That's not so surprising in and of itself.
I think what Milos meant is that there are 3 interwiki links, yet none to English.
3 versions without an English version is sort of rare, but the fact that those languages are Japanese, Swedish, and Serbian makes it all the more peculiar.
Mark
On 07/06/05, Milos Rancic millosh@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/8/05, Matt Brown morven@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/6/05, Walter van Kalken walter@vankalken.net wrote:
Only two articles on ja: do not have an equivalent on en: ? That is just a small number. There is 100's if not 1000's that do not have equivalents on en: I know because I am responsible for at least 40 or 50 or so :)
My suspicion is that what was meant is that two articles had interwiki links at all that did not include English.
Yes. (Hmm... My English...) Some time ago, I found one more such article, but I forgot its name. It is not so easy to catch interwiki for articles which don't exist on en:, but it is possible (we did it using IRC for relation sr: - ja:; I don't know for the history of sv:
- ja: relation). And I think that it should be noted for history ;)
Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@Wikimedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l