Fred Bauder wrote:
At 10:08 PM 8/25/02 -0400, Vicki Rosenzweig wrote:
Actually, I'd favor deleting some of Fredbauder's stubs, since I think entries like "a large city in southern Arizona" as the entire article reduce the chance of anyone seeing the gap and writing a good article on the subject.
My thought is that a short stub does no harm, expecially with a link to local attractions. And looking at the article, it seems there is some work, but still not a substantial article; in fact now it would seem hard to justify deleting it. Looking at history User O seems to have picked it up off recent changes and put in a few facts. I would say that the ball is rolling, if slowly.
My compliments to User 0 who did his work on June 16. Now only Flagstaff is simply a city in northern Arizona and nothing more. The fact that I'm enterring Flagstaff into the debate may very well lead to something being written about it, but that's only one article. How many more useless stubs are there which appear in links as written? They just promote a false sense of confidence that they do have content. I agree with Vicki on this. No article is often better than a useless article.
Eclecticology