Scríobh Mark Williamson:
If the Britney Spears article said "×'ר×TÖ´×~× ×TÖ´ ספּ×Tִרס ×T×-
×Ö·
[[פּ×ָפּ×.×oערע ×-×T×'ער×T×Y|פּ×ָפּ×.×oערע
×-×T×'ער]]" ("Britney Spears is a
[[popular singer]]") with an actual article of at least stub quality at the "Popular Singer" page, it could reasonably be considered a substub, but even if there was no article at "Popular Singer" I probably wouldn'tve touched it, had it been an actual sentence.
It's funny Mark, I don't seem to remember you being elevated to such a position where you could make authoritative judgements on what is a stub, a substub, or whatever. Whatever would have been the problem with just expanding the sub-sub-stub or whatever you believed it was to a good article? You know, like we do on other, non-minority Wikipedias. Yet again, both in your original infraction and your spamming of this list with hostile defensive flames, you've totally overstepped the bounds of what is commonly held to be acceptable behaviour here.
On another note, when the first post to this list informing of a problem on a minority-language Wikipedia came up, was I the only one who thought "Mark!", before I even opened it to have a read?
Regards, - Craig Franklin