Joseph Reagle wrote:
Given the latest fire-storm on questions of authority and peer review, this might make some smile! :):)
*Fifth-Grade Science Paper Doesn't Stand Up to Peer Review*
A three-member panel of 10-year-old Michael Nogroski's fellow classmates at Nathaniel Macon Elementary School unanimously agreed Tuesday that his 327-word essay "Otters" did not meet the requirements for peer approval.
Read the rest: http://www.theonion.com/news/index.php?issue=4116&n=3
Maybe he should have used this: http://pdos.csail.mit.edu/scigen/
A new way of making Wikipedia articles perhaps?