julien tayon wrote:
Yes but shoud we present the fact that it is legitimate to think Shoah never existed, or shoud we state (arbitrary) that revisionism is a far rightist theory that Shoah never existed. Can you tell me which can be written in wikipedia, and why ?
I think we can (and should) say that the theory that "Shoah never existed" is held only by a very tiny minority of people, and that no notable historian takes such claims seriously.
We absolutely should _not_ act as if holocaust revisionism and standard history are equally valid. To do so would itself be a perversion of NPOV.
--Jimbo