This is an interesting prospect. Still a journalist
is >a person who reports on something without becoming a >part of the story. Our members have some strong
differing opinions on global warming. If the distribution of WikiReaders were to take place that activity itself would need NPOV guidelines.
Still I like the idea of having press accreditations
to >various events. :-)
Ec
Just as the german WikiReader (I suppose), the idea would be to distribute a collection of articles from Wikipedia, allowing anyone to understand the topic. This would turn around the Global Warming article, but also include all those relevant to the topic
for example
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warming http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenhouse_gas http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_dioxide (and other GG gases) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fossil_fuel http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deforestation http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPCC http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_Climate_Coalition http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warming_controversy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenhouse_effect http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_sink http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyoto_protocol http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warming_potential http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precautionary_principle http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_opinion_of_global_warming http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthropogenic_global_warming http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_temperature_record ...many more
As examples
Naturally, all those will have to be NPOV.
And they will help any interested person to understand best.
Once Ed agrees with others that these articles are neutral ...:-)
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! - Internet access at a great low price. http://promo.yahoo.com/sbc/