Sabine Cretella wrote:
This is a general question - did I mention your name?
And as I said before: I am not going to discuss things again - I am already in contact with some Palttdüütsch authors that publish liteature and articles in low saxon. There are more than just some writings.
You are going the Node way now? Everytime someone discusses something with him he comes up with these mysterious off-wiki "experts" who he quotes. I really would like it if you could solve it with the people who are on-wiki if there is a problem. They are the people you work together with. They ARE the community within wikimedia. Not some outsiders who feel having to comment but not work together is a great thing to do.
And yes you DO need to discuss things things with fellow wikimedians. They are the ones you work with, not some John Doe's
Who is taking things from private to public is not me. On nds you can do whatever you want as long as the community supports you. You can use Werner's list as long as it is according to GFDL and he is mentioned as the author. I am going down to the basis as I don't like to go ahead by "xyz told me".
You are telling him that also. XYZ told me .....
I am going ahead with universities, writers and the institute for lower saxon language I suppose this should be fine when it comes to credibility - and this is what you are trying to destroy - and I really don't like that.
He is not destroying anything. These outsiders are welcome to discuss this themselves. I always hate discussion by proxy. and when people come up with all kinds of mysterious friends to which others have to bow because of their "alleged" expertise.
On the one word you told me by e-mail that was a hundred percent error turned out to be used 186 times on the internet (I have a screenshot of google if you don't believe it) and I found the writer who used it in her texts - she's a reporter for a newspaper in North Germany and has been writing articles in Pattdüütsch vor over 13 years for them now. I also contacted her to ask her how to categorise her writings.
Another mysterious supporting source.
So: anything is out of discussion here. I am not going let me impose things by anyone, I prefer research and adapt the contents we have to that..
And Heiko is not going to let you impose things upon him. Editwar anyone?
Remeber: it is not a nice thing to take things to public only since you presume I was talking about you -
It is not a nice thing to ask community help and only paint half of the picture, if you take things public name him/her so they got a chance to present their side of the argument. It has been done to me a couple of times by another wiktionarian and close friend of yours.
I did not once mention your name and what I had/still have is a general question - it does not happen the first time that people know how to improve things, but just complain about others not doing as the writer supposes - and talking about wikis: this is not the way to go and that's it. It is a very general question. If you need proofs for that: they are there in the histories.
If someone contents something you should listen to them and go in a discussion. Not just boldly go on and add the stuff elsewhere!
Ciao, Waerth/Walter