Pete/Pcb21 wrote:
The Tree of Life project's aim has always been to write about all species. I think that ambitious aim has been part of the reason for its success in becoming the largest wikiproject (tens of thousands of articles), with the most contributors.
I fully support this, as I think it is an absolutely excellent thing to be doing.
I am personally disappointed that you want to put a stop to that - presumably coming up with some guideline so that *some* species are allowed articles, but not all.
Huh? Why would we put a stop to that? Why would we come up with guidelines to prohibit some species from wikipedia? I do not support any such thing.
It also rides against the overwhelming consensus of this thread, as mentioned in my other post. Whatever their position on wikispecies, on-one has suggested crippling wikipedia.
Especially not me! I wonder if you misunderstood something I said, because I absolutely agree that Wikipedia and the Tree of Life project should have a very ambitious goal of every species.
If anything, it makes more sense to say that I think that WikiSpecies should be "crippled" in that it should not have references to Tigger and Jaws, because it is not a general encyclopedic reference work but a specialized database. But I don't accept that this amounts to "crippling" anymore than wiktionary is crippled by our insisting that a dictionary is not an encyclopedia.
--Jimbo