I am not sure if the current solution can be considerered license compliant with the GFDL.
It is true that a few problem stay open... but we do our best to be fully GFDL compliant for the next release.
I don't believe there was some urgent need that would justify a non-compliant release. As it seems this release is a copyright violation: without an internet connection and some skills in searching, one cannot find the contributors and history for any article. The fact that Wikimedia Foundation granted a license for this release to use the name Wikipedia is very worrying. While we try to protect the copyright rights of third parties in Wikipedia, the Foundation allows to some people to disregard the rights of Wikipedia users. Such a failure...
Konstantinos
Geraki@el.wikipedia