I'm pretty sure it is. The legal question here though is, as I understand it, whether or not copyrights of languages are valid or not, and apparently there is precident (Lojban) for languages being uncopyrightable.
--node
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 23:59:17 -0400, James R. Johnson modean52@comcast.net wrote:
Isn't Klingon copyrighted?
James
-----Original Message----- From: wikipedia-l-bounces@Wikimedia.org [mailto:wikipedia-l-bounces@Wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Stirling Newberry Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 11:58 PM To: Mark Williamson; wikipedia-l@Wikimedia.org Subject: Re: [Wikipedia-l] toki pona
On Sep 21, 2004, at 11:53 PM, Mark Williamson wrote:
As I said before, while the law may be debated I added the notices because of a suspected copyvio. IANAL...
--node
This point is not debateable - a language is not copyrightable, since it is an idea, not a particular work.
Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@Wikimedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@Wikimedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l