-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Brion Vibber schrieb:
Magnus Manske wrote:
Brion Vibber schrieb:
Magnus Manske wrote:
I have treated the "user anonymity problem" by showing the user IDs rather than their names. So, in its current state, it *is* possible to find the user who did the rating, but it requires actual work :-)
I find that very unusual from the perspective of how we do things, a step backwards from the open model.
Maybe I didn't make myself clear (happens:-)
I am "hiding" the user names just as a precaution, in case people don't want their ratings to be public.
But their ratings are *supposed* to be public. That's the whole point of the exercise!
The ratings *are* public! The question was wether it should be public *who* rated *what*...
Magnus