or is there some commitment to be truthful?
H. Jonat
Yes, there is. I think where you need to start is with a serious study of historical revisionism. I feel you have been victimized and misled in this area. Once you understand you cannot rely on the approaches taken then you can turn to more reliable sources. A part of the misinformation involved in historical revisionism is misdirection as to what relevant issues are and misplaced and distorted emphasis. I know it is hard to sort things out once you fall into the grip of skilled propagandists, but I think that's your path.
Wikipedia can legitimately set forth truths, what it will not do because of the editing process is allow gross distortions of the significance of a fact to distort a greater truth. So it's fine to point out that not all Jews support Zionism, just don't forget to mention that the vast majority do. A misplaced emphasis on things is hardly going to go unnoticed and unchallenged. A thesis that zionism somehow caused the war and the holocaust (even if advanced by a Jewish group) is simply not in accord with the facts. One of the historical revisionist websites makes much of fact that judicial notice was taken of the holocaust at the Nuremberg Trials saying that no actual proof was presented. Judicial notice is taken only of facts about which no reasonable person would disagree.
Fred Bauder