--- Wouter Steenbeek musiqolog@hotmail.com wrote:
From: Matt R matt_crypto@yahoo.co.uk Reply-To: wikipedia-l@Wikimedia.org To: wikipedia-l@Wikimedia.org Subject: Re: [Wikipedia-l] Wikimedia Foundation Internal Radio Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 17:54:44 +0100 (BST)
--- Wouter Steenbeek musiqolog@hotmail.com wrote:
Wouter wrote:
Suppose, by comparision, that I suggested for fun that orthodox
Muslims
were
right in saying homosexuals should be executioned. I don't think
that
would
make you smile; in your position, I would ask for immediate removal
of
the
offender from the mailing list and permanent blocking on Wikipedia.
Why on earth should such a person be blocked?
-- Matt
Because I would take it serious and don't want people with this and
similar
views to edit Wikipedia.
Why shouldn't people with such views edit Wikipedia? What about NPOV (Neutral Point of View)?
NPOV has its limits, Matt. Such persons would probably start modfiing pages like [[Homosexuality]], [[Sexuality]], [[Osama bin Laden]], [[George Bush]] etc etc, just because extremists cannot distinguish fact and opinion. Of course, they cannot be removed after a lot of such violations.
We should welcome extremists modifying such pages, as long as they follow our policies (like NPOV). I don't see how we should exclude editors because of what they think. We can exclude them if they edit in violation of our policies, of course. But remember that it is quite possible for editors to hold extreme views, even views that you may find obnoxious, and yet still be a moderate and valuable Wikipedia contributor.
-- Matt
Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com