I agree, but still, with new software almost ready to go, serious digging into what's wrong with the old softwear seems senseless. (Although one might stumble on something).
Fred Bauder
At 03:14 PM 7/12/02 +0200, you wrote:
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Tim Chambers wrote:
I'm deeply saddened that Wikipedia is a victim of its own success,
No, it is victim to poor architecture. It's a software problem in the Wikipedia PHP source code.
The developers seem totally clueless about performance issues. There is a constant focus on new functions, and none on performance and response times. They cannot even say what the average response time has been in the last week or 24 hours. (Hey, prove me wrong: Tell me the average.)
-- Lars Aronsson (lars@aronsson.se) tel +46-70-7891609 http://aronsson.se/ http://elektrosmog.nu/ http://susning.nu/
[Wikipedia-l] To manage your subscription to this list, please go here: http://www.nupedia.com/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l