> This text, with no link and no details about the image, would name and > shame the Foobar company, but would not help Foobar sell copies of the > image.
Bad idea. Maybe if they try to sue use for no good reason or violate the license, but any other offence is not in the free spirits I have.
It appears you disagree with me on something. I can't tell what the issue is, though.
BTW: What is your opinion on who manages the copyrights of IP-users?
I cannot understand this either. What are "IP-users"? If I guess that "IP" stands for "intellectual property", I still can't understand what the question means; but please don't *ever* use the term "intellectual property". It spreads bias and confusion.