Hoi, Yes, and from Sicilians and from others and from myself as well. Then again what is it to you. Do you need to reply to everything? Are you "the keeper of our collective conscience"??
"And from myself as well" -- yes, but you're not Italian, are you? I don't see what's wrong with asking a question that is quite relevant. I don't reply to everything, only those topics which I have a question about.
Surely, it didn't hurt for you to respond to my question. And, I'm sure that everybody will be more open-minded to your request now that we know that there has been input from real, living, Italian people, instead of only you.
And to be absolutely plain about it, you are not the only one speaking about languages with other people. I at least have the courtesy of keeping almost all of it of this or any other list. I need to learn about languages and I do but your learning process if way too public.
I will remind you that intlwiki-l was merged into this list. Thus, all posts here about languages, no matter how off-topic they may seem for "wikipedia-l", are more on-topic because this is also where what once would've gone on intlwiki-l should go. If you don't want that much public discourse about language and linguistics with regards to Wikipedia, then you are welcome to campaign for the re-separation of the mailinglist.
But you have already indicated that you are against a re-separation -- anything that affects policy or creates a new Wikipedia should go on this list, right? Then, stop whinging about it.
On the subject of interwiki links, both no and nb give the same name for the language in the Interwiki links. This does not work out well in Wiktionary where you find no and nb often side by side.
This is true. The recommended practice is to replace links to no: with links to nb:, if I recall correctly.
Thanks Mark