What really baffles me here is how relatively petty incidents can cause people to write lengthy editorial articles, philosophizing about "key shifts in society" in general and alleged conspiracies at Wikipedia in particular (while the actual explanation is much more mundane). The only reason I can think of seems to be superabundance of time combined with a total lack of more fulfilling occupation in life.
Arbeo
--- Sam Korn smoddy@gmail.com schrieb:
On 9/18/05, Stirling Newberry stirling.newberry@xigenics.net wrote:
Then that is a huge user interface and security
hole - because
someone looking at the history of the image would
think that the
original uploader uploaded the image. In an
organization that relies
on users being able to track and document problems
this is gap in
that ability.
Look at the bottom of the image page. There is your file history.
Sam _______________________________________________ Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@Wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
___________________________________________________________ Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - Jetzt mit 1GB Speicher kostenlos - Hier anmelden: http://mail.yahoo.de