Tim Starling wrote:
I just wanted to be clear that I agree with this completely. At the bare minimum of a first change, the page http://static.wikipedia.org/
Should make it very clear that this dump is not for commercial use with our logo still on it.
I thought it did. I wrote:
"There are a number of known bugs, also it is likely that these dumps do not fully satisfy the license requirements of the GFDL. Also, note that putting one of these dumps on the web unmodified will constitute a trademark violation. They are intended for private viewing in an intranet or desktop installation."
Ok, my mistake, I'm very very sorry. I didn't see that. I apologize for any confusion.
--Jimbo