From my point of view as a native English speaker who lives in England (not
in the American sense of "UK"!) I think it's important that when I type in words like: "colour" That I get "colour" and not "color". I don't see why I need to know the spelling of the word in what to me is a foreign language when I'm looking up a word in a dictionary of my language. --- To GerardM Basically there are two orthographies for English. Some might argue the toss about that, I mean for myself as a "Scots" speaker, I know there are some who make a big deal about it being a separate language, but I myself don't know how to spell it properly, and I just think of it as a regional dialect of English like Scouse, Yorkshire, Texan, Kiwi and whatever else - because I would read normal English and pronounce it the same way as Scots - the odd word like "leid" to me is no different than a Yorkshireman saying "summat" for "something" or someone from the southeast USA saying "y'all" - they're just dialect words. I can show you texts written in a Yorkshire orthography, but the practical fact is that the overwhelming majority of the text in the modern world is either spelt the English way, or the American way. The debate is "huge" in terms of it's implications, because up until now no-one appears to have challenged the idea that American-English has the right to be considered the standard form of English. It's patently obvious it's a dialect, with it's own orthography and it's simply wrong for the headword in English to be written in a dialect of English in a dialectal orthography and presented as the standard form, when it's not.