Eclecticology wrote:
Axel Boldt wrote:
I vote for simply removing this "100,000 article" sentence.
I can see your point, but I don't see it as much of a concern. Building bulk is fine as a short term goal. If the projections that I made a few days ago are at all meaningful we should reach that 100,000 early in 2003. Let's leave it in until we reach that goal then not replace it with any new numerical goal at that time.
But we will *not* reach that goal in 2003 or (I predict) any time soon! The page says (in '' IIRC) 100,000 *complete* articles. I think that it's a fine goal for the future (however arbitrary), although I still think that it will only confuse newcomers, who may not notice the crucial "complete" (however emphasised). So I'm with Axel; remove it.
-- Toby