Chuck Smith wrote:
Why not simply:
- Afghanistan history
One argument against that form of name is that it is harder to use as a link from another page. I can easily write:
Charles Darwin was very interested in the [[history of Afghanistan]].
but it doesn't make good English to write:
Charles Darwin was very interested in [[Afghanistan history]]. in [[Egypt history]]. in [[Sweden history]].
Afghanistani (?), Egyptian, and Swedish history would work, though. As would Afghanistan's, Egypt's, and Sweden's history. Then the argument is that "History of Afghanistan" is already in majority.