1. I never said they were. I just said that there are many different encyclopedias, and illustrated that it was not practical to use what is included in a single encyclopedia as a criterium for inclusion, especially when the encyclopaedia isn't one of general knowledge.
2. Can you prove they're not equivalent?
3. If you can prove they're not equivalent, can you prove they're not analogous?
Mark
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 10:19:16 +1100, David Gerard fun@thingy.apana.org.au wrote:
Mark Williamson (node.ue@gmail.com) [050121 08:21]:
There are many different encyclopedias. If I write "Encyclopedia of All the Molecules in Jimbo Wales' body, with a detailed biography and label for each", does that mean each article in there deserves a spot in Wikipedia? Heavens no.
Recipe encyclopedias are not equivalent to this hypothetical example. Do you have any real examples?
- d.