-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Le Friday 05 December 2003 15:57, Andre Engels a écrit :
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, Jimmy Wales wrote:
I would like to encourage a similar setup on the larger non-English wikipedias, perhaps customized to some extent to fit localized needs. But the overall concept is to have in place clear methods for group decision making that are respectful of our overall ideals.
On the English wikipedia, this was not necessary until now, but on the other wikipedias I think that it is necessary sooner because there is no real way for me to be an effective benevolent dictator.
So, let's discuss this.
As far as my experience from the Dutch Wikipedia is, I do not see any need for this kind of institute yet. De facto the ruling is currently done by a relatively large group, consisting basically of the regular contributors (including but not restricted to the sysops). What conflicts there are that do not get immediately and amicably resolved, usually are between a single new user and several existing users. That would hardly be helped by mediation or arbitration, as a new user would see such as a clique protecting each other any way. Besides, they usually tend to either change their ways into something more fitting or leave Wikipedia well before that.
Andre Engels
For the French WP, I would say like Andre. Up to now, most of the problems have been solved by discussion and consensus. In the case of the recently banned user, it is after that any other solution was tried that a unanimous vote decided to ban him.
Yann
- -- http://www.non-violence.org/ | Site collaboratif sur la non-violence http://www.forget-me.net/ | Alternatives sur le Net http://fr.wikipedia.org/ | Encyclopédie libre http://www.forget-me.net/pro/ | Formations et services Linux