In case there are anglo-saxon readers: Koll has done it again
It's just a mixture of polemics and pretzel logic - like I called it, 'german fuzzy logic'.
He has withdrawn the preposterous 'paranoia' allegation. That was real quick. Simultaneously, he's trying to replace it with a lighter kind of accusation, called 'querulantentum' (I leave it up to you if you find a suitable translation for that in english - my suspicion is, this is just another kind of german invention to try and muzzle uncomfortable messengers by giving them a name a court can find useful to abuse. Weren't nazi courts actively thriving on this notion ('querulantentum')? A smiley won't help damping this new insult of his.
He remains inflexible in the real issue, though. His tactics are to try and divert your attention from the fact that I gave all the pertinent information in my english-language messages. In other words, there is no need to read the german part of my website. Just trust that what I state is true information, then go from there. Do I give any reason to believe that I were not telling the truth?
It is the german type of 'governance logic' at de.wikipedia.org that this case is about. And it should be easily understandable through my original message already. Otherwise, let me know what else you'd like to know or have explained.
In case Koll still hasn't comprehended it: I am not interested in the kind of statements he has delivered so far. Is someone else? Then, at least I would prefer not to hear from him again.