Patrick Hall wrote:
On 6/27/05, Ray Saintonge saintonge@telus.net wrote:
Tim Starling wrote:
I think we can put the blame on our use of language code lists which are biased towards political rather than linguistic divisions.
An important observation. In Wiktionary I keep having to beat back the argument that a wide assortment of conlangs are acceptable because they have been granted a code.
Ec
Which are those, just out of curiosity? (I imagine the list includes Esperanto and Volapük?)
Esperanto, Interlingua and Volapük have been established for some time. I suppose too that Ido and Lojban have some claim to legitimacy.
I just cleaned out a number of Latenkwa entries. Then there's Romanica, Espreso, Sasxsek, Lingua Franca Nova, Klingon, Quenya, D'ni, Glos, Bitruscan, Sindarin, Cirth, Tengwar, and probably a few others.
Ec