I think this illustrates why the GNU FDL is so important to what we are doing here.
Did someone say that some of their content is under GNU FDL? In reading all about this lawsuit and the resolution of it, I don't see that anywhere.
I'd be fearful of using content from this, even if it is claimed to be under the GNU FDL, because I don't want to tangle with CRC Publishing. I'm not saying that I'm 100% against it, just that I want us to be thoughtful.
--Jimbo