Anthere wrote:
Is that censorship ?
Well... self-censorship, perhaps.
But
- the day clitoris pictures are put on the english wikipedia without
causing an uproar (because clitoris are shoking and might get wikipedia censored in schools)
- the day we can put ethnic statistics on the french wikipedia without
causing an uproar (because "races" do not exist and publishing stats might get wikipedia shut down for publishing illegal information)
You should note that the clitoris pictures currently are, and have been for upwards of a year, included in the English Wikipedia.
Also, nobody has seriously suggested removing them: the argument has been over whether to have them inline or linked. There is no measurable support for actually suppressing their availability, so I don't see the similarity---they will be there in some shape or form regardless of which side in the argument prevails.
-Mark