Does this mean the NPOV is violated if a meta tag is inserted to allow parents to filter out detailed specific information and blueprints on bomb building?
YES! By establishing a standard of what information may be desired to be filtered by parents and which information may not, we are grossly violating NPOV. What if a hypothetical parent wanted their children to be isolated from religious ideas? While I consider censorship of any form a human rights violation, I can certainly understand protecting children from religion better than protecting children from pornography. There is no scientific evidence whatsoever that pornography is harmful to children. Religion, on the other hand, clearly is.
A triple X standard, a standard of "tags", whatever you come up with, *will* be a violation of NPOV. It must not, under any circumstances, happen. Otherwise I will campaign to replace the tripple X with a triple + standard to indicate the degree of religious content.
The only option I see where the violation of NPOV can be avoided is the system of grouped certification I describe. Then anybody can choose the certification/filtering scheme they prefer.
Regards,
Erik