Anthere Wrote:
In Wikipedia case, most people will only go to one of the links most of time. So a portal is not very interesting maybe? Except if on the second connexion, the user is directly brought to the right xx.wikipedia.org. Otherwise, it is a lack of time.
But if on the second connexion the user is brought to the xx.wikipedia.org, he will rarely go to the www.wikipedia.org and maybe is it loosing something. No ?
Besides, you will notice I used the word "partners". A portal tends to atomize things rather than to interlink them.
Does what I say make more sense now ? Do you think I am wrong in my feeling or not ?
You make some good points. What would you have on the page to make it more consistently useful?
kq