-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Gregory Maxwell schrieb:
On 6/5/05, Magnus Manske magnus.manske@web.de wrote:
So I thought, why not, upon upload of a new image, *automatically* add "{{unverified}}" to any image dewscription that does *not* contain the sequence "{{"? This is dead easy technically, and will bring untagged images to our attention without wasting time and effort of people who could do something more constructive.
A good idea, but I'm concerned that users will just guess a license when they are fixing unverified images. It is already the case that wikipedia has many images incorrectly tagged.
Most of the time only the uploader can identify the copyright except in the rare case of an historically notable image that we're using as fair use... For other case it would take more effort to locate the source (if it's even possible) than to replace the image, and in many of the cases where the image wasn't notable but we could find it without the uploader the image will not be free for us to use.
Because of this the unverified template need to instruct users not to add the license. Users should hunt down the uploader and get the uploader to set it. If the uploader is not available we should dump the image.
Some can be tagged correctly without the original uploader: * fair use * where a suitable source is given * images that are obviously PD because of age and probably some other cases.
That said, the {{unverified}} template should probably include a warning not just to guess a license, and that doing so might have legal consequences. After all, if I tag a copyrighted picture with, say, {{GFDL}}, and wikipedia (or someone else using it) gets sued, they can point to me for tagging it, right?
Magnus