You can regard this as a follow up to http://www.nupedia.com/pipermail/wikipedia-l/2002-September/thread.html#star... "Why the free encyclopedia movement needs to be more like the free software movement."
I want to make a proposal to make a new website that contains just a subset of Wikipedia articles. Please, if you want to comment on this proposal, read it twice or three times; I have the strange effect on people of seeming to say one thing when really, I said the exact opposite, or something quite different, anyway.
Wikipedia is open content, so strictly speaking, I don't have to ask anybody's permission to do this, and in fact (see below), I think the new website should be entirely independent of Wikipedia. But I *do* *really* want the approval of this community. I want you, or many of you, behind the idea. I want to start us all out on the right foot here.
------
In view of the facts that Wikipedia has grown tremendously; that we have lost several of our most overeducated, overqualified participants due to disgust with having to deal with a few difficult, uncooperative participants; and above all, that there is a vast body of *hundreds* of highly educated and willing free encyclopedia participants waiting idle due to the dormancy of Nupedia; I propose the following:
(1) We--whether Bomis or someone else--should set up another website. It should definitely not live at the Wikipedia.com domain.
(2) The purpose of the new website will be to *select* and *post* Wikipedia articles that are up to a certain standard.
(3) The only participants in the new website will be those that meet the Nupedia requirements in their particular fields, or some other similarly stringent requirements.
(4) Either I, or a small group of trusted people, will be responsible for approving participants.
(5) The website will be *read only*. No one will be able to edit it directly, including its participants. This means it *won't* be a wiki.
(6) Any participant will have to go to Wikipedia to make any edits to an article.
(7) Participants will save *particular versions* of articles, not the current article, whatever it happens to be. There should be a link to "the most current version" of a given article on Wikipedia, as well.
(8) Implementing the website should not require *any* changes to Wikipedia. I want to leave Wikipedia alone completely. The only thing that *might* make sense is to add a link (which should be optional!) to a corresponding "subset" website article, if it exists. In particular, "subset" participants should **not** be regarded as Wikipedia editors with any particular, special status on Wikipedia. And "subset" policy, whatever it might turn out to be, should **not** be regarded as Wikipedia policy.
(9) Also, I don't think we should host this website on Nupedia.com. Too many Nupedians will want to have nothing to do with it.
Caveats:
I realize that I and others have made similar sorts of suggestions in the past. That's great. Now let's do something.
The above is just a proposal. I might be persuaded to get behind something quite different.
Another leading approval process idea, one that I have supported in the past, is the idea that *anyone* could approve *any* articles, and then users could make list of "approved approvers," i.e., people whose opinions on articles they trust. I still think that's an intriguing idea, but I also don't think it's one that will attract the many Nupedia participants who want to be working on a free encyclopedia project. Elitism leaves a bad taste in my mouth as it does for many, but we *need* a *going* project that will attract some of the most educated, knowledgable, intelligent, clearest-thinking people to the overall task of building a free encyclopedia. The point is obviously *not* to *be* elitist; it is to make a project that participants can see there are adequate safeguards that their time will not be wasted by any yahoo who can just come along and ruin their work.
There's nothing to stop us from implementing *both* proposals, by the way. (Someone made this point before, too, I remember.)
But I intend to get behind the proposal articulated in (1)-(7) above. And I'd like to get any interested programmers behind it ASAP, and I'll be only too happy to collaborate on some of the basic policy and mission statements of the website.
Then we can get Julie and Michael back, perhaps, and put to work people like G. B. Lane, Gaytha Langlois, Michael Witbrock, Munawar Anees, Ruth Ifcher (of course!), and all the other smart and wonderful people I worked with on Nupedia. Maybe this will be a way to get Nupedia itself kick-started again.
--Larry