On 7/4/03 8:17 PM, "Erik Moeller" erik_moeller@gmx.de wrote:
The-
On 7/4/03 6:35 PM, "Erik Moeller" erik_moeller@gmx.de wrote:
Cunc-
What of that is in the "article" space? None.
Actually, the subpage backlinks are a good comparison. They are also displayed by default, in roughly the same location, and a navigational structure that is not directly editable. And they're not a user preference.
And are there subpage backlinks in the Wikipedia article space? No.
Define "Wikipedia article space". They are right below the subtitle, where the TOC was initially placed. Sure, we have subpages disabled for the main namespace, but that is for an entirely different reason, and irrelevant to your argument, which is bogus anyway, since there is no "sacred article space" which must not be violated.
I find it difficult to defend the "sacred article space" claim. You must be right.
Oh wait, that's a straw man you constructed, as I never claimed there was a "sacred article space".
Funny, that.
The content of the Wikipedia pages below the title and above the links at the bottom has always been entirely user-configurable. To change that summarily is not something to be taken lightly.