Maury Markowitz wrote:
I recently got into a minor squable that started with another example of what I refer to as "drive-by tagging". Basically someone comes by an article and inserts a whole bunch of tags without any comment. Some of these may be valid, others less so, but very often its impossible to know one way or the other without the original "tagger" pointing out the problems.
For instance, consider this example I came across recently: Mirror Fusion Test Facility. The "tagger" inserted a needs cats and needs wikification. The cats one was entirely valid and I added one, but I can't for the life of me even imagine what needs additional wikification. It seems to follow the style guide perfectly. I wrote to the tagger, but he responded saying "by following the link within the tag for all you need to know about wikifying an article", which is a non-answer.
I would like to hear any comments you all may have on this topic. Is it OK to simply remove vague tags if the article in question does not appear to have a problem related to the tag and there is no comment? I ask because, as I noted, the last time I removed tags the tagger then stamped the article with a PROD, their argument being that removing tags is PRODable.
Maury
I think procedure for most of these is tag the article AND leave a note on the talk page. This may not apply to {{wikify}} but then I don't there there is any "burden of prof" to removing {{wikify}}. If you remove it then and they put it back then you have a legatimate content dispute which policy says shoudl be discussed. Either way you get them on the talk page.
As for PROD is that not {{PROD}} which simply if I am not mistaken says that ANYONE can remove it with only the reason that they disagree? The template itself says "If this template is removed, it should not be replaced."
SKL