jesus your so funny. I know spelt it wrong, but I can't be arsed to delete every single typo, this isn't copy. you might be amused to hear that my job is correcting people's spelling mistakes, but I'm not so petullant (do you like that one?!) as to currect your's (and yes, I put the apostrophe there on purpose).
On 20/09/05, Giuseppe DAngelo pippudoz@yahoo.it wrote:
Message: 9 Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 13:54:04 -0700 From: Mark Williamson Subject: Re: [Wikipedia-l] Wikipedia English English To: wikipedia-l@wikimedia.org Message-ID: 849f98ed050919135443fb84e2@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Irrelevent, how?
See, now, this is just what I've been waiting for since the beginning of this thread. Our little friend here who cares so much about "correct" spelling and grammar has fouled up our beautiful language by using an absolutely incorrect spelling, ignorant of the etymology of the word.
It's "irrelevant". In all English varieties.
Mark
P.S.
That stuff I said about fouling up our beautiful language was a joke.
maybe he meant to say "irreverent" - it fits the context just as well!
pippu d'angelo
Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi, antispam, antivirus, POP3 _______________________________________________ Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@Wikimedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l