-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Bryan Derksen schrieb:
David Gerard wrote:
Anthere (anthere9@yahoo.com) [050522 01:22]:
It's editorial work on the project like any other. How good you are with ratings is as much part of your reputation as how good you are with edits. I don't see any reason *not* to make it as public as any other editorial work.
Indeed, since a key factor regarding how I would treat a rating or review is the reputation of the reviewer I think it's _necessary_ to keep track of these sorts of things. This isn't like scientific peer review where one at least has a reasonable guarantee that the reviewers know the subject matter; any J. Random Yahoo could be doing the rating in this case (I'm assuming it'll be pretty open or it won't scale well). People could also wind up rating their own work, which should be noted.
On the other hand, we don't make watchlists public so giving a list of all reviewed articles might not be a good idea. Maybe just make reviews show up in user contributions along with other edits, so recent work is theoretically available for checking but it slides off over the horizon of history after a while.
OK, the current code in CVS can show a list of the ratings of a user. All articles, all revisions, all topics, including comments. Users are, again, only refered to by ID than by name.
In the current state, it will only show these data for the user who asks :-)
Changing that so that everyone can see everyone's elses ratings would be a matter of changing two lines in the source...
Magnus