--- Mark Christensen mchristensen@humantech.com wrote:
BUT PLEASE: No anchors adressable from outside!
There is nearly no difference to subpages.
I think I understand your point, but I don't follow your argument. Accessibility from outside was never an important problem with subpages. The key problem with subpages is that they created a "hardcoded" link hierarchy, and that they create ambigous and overlaping logical namespaces. Should Chess be it's own article, or should it be Boardgames/Chess, or Strategy games/Chess? It's not at all obvious that allowing HTML anchors would create these problems.
Perhaps I'm missing something, but I'd like to be able to see how --exactly-- anchors are "nearly indistinguishable" from subpages. If you see this more clearly than I, could you please explain it to me.
I don't see the "anchors are subpages" argument either. I'm reworking the FAQ, and I was wishing for anchors so that I could create a clickable index of questions. Spinning each individual question into a separate page is a bad idea.
Stephen G.
__________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More http://faith.yahoo.com