Ok, but they would still have to be reconfirmed all the time under a proposal like that...
On 10/1/05, Alphax alphasigmax@gmail.com wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
Phroziac wrote:
You would probably annoy the stewards if you desysop a lot of people, but I really don't think you'll have to desysop as many as you think. This is a good idea, and I tried to get something similar passed on en wiki, and it didn't work....obviously. We have 500 *active* admins, we would have to run several re-elections all the time, constantly. So, remember, this won't scale well.
Playing Devil's Advocate, I dispute that number.
I don't think that all 500 are *active*.
We could try it out for Bureaucrats first...
Alphax | /"\ Encrypted Email Preferred | \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign OpenPGP key ID: 0xF874C613 | X Against HTML email & vCards http://tinyurl.com/cc9up | / \ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQEVAwUBQz33crMAAH8MeUlWAQgREQf7BavwN/HhYj2tgKUu9ZFLZ2fg+Qxz7wDf oO5SLBC1+GjrZWfkZWVkcZCs8SzWbY1JI/9jPnCjEAVBaxHcxx8zyIPz+ZqLhj/7 W1rsuTU1Vf+tNijPScl9wugBaaRYQJExDoM1yehsFYHToZ46rAjdEvSIQ9XmKa4F HDSmxViJyKAkLrO4/uNSXl0lMlwAiYOE+e+lnUT3j/QYgHgNEvHhEKOvsm6U1LOZ qBAKHYjG8c7sc3XydHRxo0kbnR3uXpSvFCIMHBy9ruj8E3oomdZ2MjLYkyFjjEj8 GTkznrh7fKE3QCulOGTNlKtGGm0MAewvrzCdWjlpB4/Zg0+Rp+0LOQ== =Lzrp -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@Wikimedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l