Lars Aronsson a écrit:
Brion Vibber wrote:
I've only skimmed these posts, but they seem to boil down to historical trivia ("we had 24 articles not 12!") and saying we should do things
Actually the article is a lot better than that. It's an important piece of history in the writing. I'm looking forward to the book. Larry is very careful to point out that he is Wikipedia's friend and I see no conflict.
He started it as a test, and it snowballed out of control. Nobody could predict its popularity. Larry to me seems like a hesitant Martin Luther who says "wait, I didn't want to start a new church, only reform the old one!" But nobody wants to wait.
Yo, I personally added the link to the retro page on meta two days ago. I think it is an important part of our history. Pov yes, but interesting.
Ant