Serbian Wikipedia doesn't have POV articles more then English Wikipedia (of course, proportional). It is possible that some ov POV pages are not marked, but this is only because NO ONE marked them (Dejan could do it, but he didn't).
I did do it. And the storm rolled upon me. I was mostly quickly reverted, or even rolled back. In fact, if I remember correctly, I was the one to introduce POV and copyvio templates, no? Check out my contributions on sr.wiki (User:Dcabrilo). When I started doing it, you proposed that we allow POV articles to stay on the wiki, with a permanent template of: "This article was written from such and such POV". I said we should either get rid of them, or rewrite them. You said you thought they were just too good of essays to delete, and that you talked to Jimbo Wales while he was in Belgrade about that issue.
And Serbian Wikipedia has more POV than English one, for sure. For example, just until few hours ago, this thing was stuck on the top of the Home Page:
http://sr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D0%A8%D0%B0%D0%B1%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%...
(MARRY CHRISTMAS)
Also, just for example, I noticed that article I labeled as POV (my mistake, it was not only POV, it was also a copyvio from http://www.svetosavlje.org/biblioteka/Recnik/A.htm), has been locked since I put a POV tag on it... May 2004. (http://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%90%D0%B4%D0%B0%D0%BC_%D0%B8_%D0%95%D0%B2%D0...).
So, yes, I did try to work on POV, but you and many others had no problems with POV (recognized as such) being included in the name space. As long as it had a tag...
Only on May 13th did I label about a dozen articles as POV (mostly Orthodox Christianity related). [[Википедија:Провера неутралности]]. Many of those were beyond repair (they were simply religious essays).
However, community than agreed that "We are a Serbian Wikipedia, so it's only normal to have that kind of bias".
Latin alphabet is needed only because of Croats. Bosnians know Cyrillics; if Slovenians know Serbian/Croatian, they know Cyrillics, too. As well as Macedonians use only Cyrillics.
Most Slovenes and Croats are not good with Cyrillic, and not comfortable enough with it to make edits. Many Bosnians as well. This is especially true for younger people. Most Macedonians, unlike most Slovenes, can read and write in both Cyrillic and Latin for that matter.
A lot of sites are in Latin only because of a lot of xenophobia toward Cyrillics.
Also because that way it's accessible to anyone.
Wikipedia is not a cultural project, it's an encyclopedia, aimed at bringing information to people.
You can use a blog for spreading informations, too.
And what do you think Wikipedia is for? Spreading what? Wikipedia is an attempt at encyclopedia, which is as simple as disseminating NPOV ecyclopedic information.
Cheers, Dejan