From: marudubshinki@gmail.com To: wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 03:39:25 -0400 Subject: Re: [Wikipedia-l] Are we running out of sources
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 3:08 AM, Ray Saintongesaintonge@telus.net wrote:
A "lie of omission" is often considered to be a lie, as the name suggests.
That term is one of your own invention.
Lie of omission is his invention?
1m ghits http://www.google.com/search?num=100&q=%22lie%20of%20omission%22 and 612 book hits http://books.google.com/books?num=100&q=%22lie of omission" and [[Lie#Types of lies]] (not to mention the multiple usages in our other articles: https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=Special%3ASearch...)
all say to me that lie of omission is exactly what I thought it was: a common English phrase. Where is the invention here?
-- gwern
What I believe was the question here was not who coined the phrase "lie of ommission", but rather who brought it into the discussion.
/Lennart
Lennart Guldbrandsson, ordförande för Wikimedia Sverige http://se.wikimedia.org/wiki/Huvudsida
Tfn: 031 - 12 50 48 Mobil: 070 - 207 80 05 Epost: l_guldbrandsson@hotmail.com Användarsida: http://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anv%C3%A4ndare:Hannibal Blogg: http://mrchapel.wordpress.com/
_________________________________________________________________ Med Windows Live kan du ordna, redigera och dela med dig av dina foton. http://www.microsoft.com/sverige/windows/windowslive/products/photo-gallery-...