Anthony DiPierro wrote:
Not sure what's *horrible* about no derivative works. Wikipedia doesn't need to alter most images. I'd take cc-nd over copyrighted with fair use. If cc-nd is completely unacceptable, then so is fair use, right?
A
It seems obvious to me that No Deriviative Works is completely unacceptable. _______________________________________________ Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@Wikimedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@Wikimedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
I've dual licensed my images under cc-by-sa (attribution, share alike). This seems to closest to the GFDL and I believe to be copyleft.
Caroline/Secretlondon